timing belt change

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by newman, May 12, 2007.

  1. newman

    newman Guest

    It looks like I may need a timing belt soon. My 1999 4 cyl now has 105000,
    which is what manual recommends for belt change.

    I have been quoted about $760 for complete job; belt, water pump, seals.
    This quote by non-Honda dealer.

    Is this a reasonable quote for this job? I live in Northern Texas.

    Thanks
     
    newman, May 12, 2007
    #1
  2. newman

    Paul Guest

    In the past week I have been quoted $578 and $702 for this job on my 2000
    Accord SE (4 cyl.). These quotes are from two independent shops in Houston,
    so I would say you're at least in the ballpark.

    Paul
     
    Paul, May 13, 2007
    #2
  3. newman

    AnotherSquid Guest

    I have been quoted about $760 for complete job; belt, water pump, seals.
    Hmm... $440 at HonToyCare, Boulder, Colorado. I just had mine replaced
    on my '98 Civic EX. The price includes water pump, seals, etc. A
    complete job.

    Andy
     
    AnotherSquid, May 15, 2007
    #3
  4. newman

    swllz Guest

    Civic might be cheaper, because Civic does not have balance shaft.
     
    swllz, May 15, 2007
    #4
  5. newman

    Earle Horton Guest

    Imho, seals, tensioner and water pump are unnecessary the first time. They
    tell you to replace the water pump at the parts counter, because it is a
    bear to get to unless the timing belt is off. But if you're not paying for
    labor it isn't so hard on the wallet. If you've always used Honda Genuine
    Coolant and been somewhat conscientious about replacing it, your water pump
    is likely good as new.

    Earle
     
    Earle Horton, May 15, 2007
    #5
  6. newman

    Joe LaVigne Guest

    Sure, but for the price of a water pump, it is worth the peace of mind, IMO.

    A water pump is not very expensive...
     
    Joe LaVigne, May 15, 2007
    #6
  7. newman

    Earle Horton Guest

    True, but lots of people who work on their own cars do so for financial
    reasons, and I really don't like throwing a water pump, that looks and feels
    just like a new one, in the trash.

    Earle
     
    Earle Horton, May 15, 2007
    #7
  8. 105000!!!!!! Holy crap I wouldve changed the belt at 60-70k .
     
    Private Private, May 18, 2007
    #8
  9. newman

    Joe LaVigne Guest

    And you'd have been wasting your money. They are good to at least 105k.
    Honda under-estimates it to make sure their reputation stays stellar.

    Of course, driving a shitty Dodge, you'd be wise to change it early...
     
    Joe LaVigne, May 18, 2007
    #9
  10. newman

    alfred Guest

    I had my 2005 Accord Serpentine belt changed at 30k miles, but a timing belt
    should go alot longer than 60k i would hope!
     
    alfred, May 30, 2007
    #10
  11. If your Accord is a 4-cylinder, it uses a timing chain that typically has no
    replacement interval. If you have a V6, that uses a belt and the interval
    is likely somewhere in the vicinity of 7 years or 100,000 miles, whichever
    comes first.
     
    High Tech Misfit, May 30, 2007
    #11
  12. My car is a 1993 del sol and i changed the timing belt 6 months ago. I
    thought timing belts have an age limit too?? Am I wrong? I mean would
    you trust a 14 year old timing belt?
     
    Private Private, Jun 2, 2007
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.