timing belt on 04 accord 4cyl

Discussion in 'Accord' started by CaptainKrunch, Jul 20, 2004.

  1. Is there a belt or chain on the 04 4cyl accord?
     
    CaptainKrunch, Jul 20, 2004
    #1
  2. CaptainKrunch

    Larry B. Guest

    Chain...never needs to be replaced..


    L.B.
     
    Larry B., Jul 20, 2004
    #2
  3. CaptainKrunch

    curly12 Guest

    why do you say a chain never needs to be replaced. Typically timing
    chains last anywhere from 150,000 miles to 250,000 miles.
    The chain will stretch over time, the sprockets will wear over time, the
    tensioner will wear over time. There may not be a recommended change
    interval like a belt, but they will wear out over some time and will cause
    the same kind of problems when they wear out or worse problems when they
    fail.
     
    curly12, Jul 20, 2004
    #3
  4. CaptainKrunch

    Eric Guest

    The recommended interval is 150K miles.
     
    Eric, Jul 21, 2004
    #4
  5. CaptainKrunch

    Larry B. Guest

    My maintenace manual has no such interval. (Canadian) Where did you get this
    information?

    LB.
     
    Larry B., Jul 21, 2004
    #5
  6. CaptainKrunch

    Eric Guest

    http://www.high-road.com/maintenance/maintenance.htm
     
    Eric, Jul 21, 2004
    #6
  7. CaptainKrunch

    Larry B. Guest

    Thanks for the link. I am not sure about the validity of a service interval
    coming from a shop whose business is maintenace but it is something to
    consider. A chain usually will not need to be replaced unless it stretches
    or corrodes. Both are unlikely but having the chain inspected at some
    frequency is prudent.

    LB.
     
    Larry B., Jul 22, 2004
    #7
  8. CaptainKrunch

    Eric Guest

    I have known the owner of the shop for 16 years. He has a degree in
    mechanical engineering. I trust his judgment and I believe that it
    would be difficult to find a shop with more integrity.

    Eric
     
    Eric, Jul 22, 2004
    #8
  9. CaptainKrunch

    rjdriver Guest


    The main difference between belt and chain (aside from the fact that
    belts are usually quieter) is that there will be definate unignorable signs
    that something is wrong well before the chain breaks.

    Engine rattle upon starting that goes away after a few seconds, knocking
    upon acceleration/deceleration, valve noises, excessive oil consumption,
    rough idle, difficulty starting, etc. are all things that will alert the
    owner to have the vehicle checked.

    Belts will often fail with no warning at all, and when there are signs
    they are subtle and easily dismissed as something less important.
    Inspections don't always tell the whole story as the belt can look fine from
    the outside, but be frayed and ready to break underneath where it cant be
    seen.

    It just seems foolish to me to pay $200 to $400 to have a $30.00 belt
    replaced, when the only real benefit to having that belt instead of chain is
    a little quieter engine. Add to that the risk of complete engine failure
    when a belt breaks on cars without free floating valves, and there is just
    no upside at all to belts.


    Bob
     
    rjdriver, Jul 24, 2004
    #9
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.