Timing belt or chain?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jim White, Sep 13, 2003.

  1. Jim White

    Jim White Guest

    Does the 2003 Accord have a timing belt or chain? Does it make a
    difference?
    TIA
     
    Jim White, Sep 13, 2003
    #1
  2. Jim White

    meld_b Guest

    Can't help you with what that Accord has, but YES it does make a
    difference... With the chain you can have this ancient engine and
    mechanics can listen to the car and say... naaa you don't need to change
    it yet at around 180+ With the belt, you pretty much need to do it when
    the manual (or someone who knows the car) says.

    Just my 2 cents.
    -D
     
    meld_b, Sep 13, 2003
    #2
  3. Jim White

    harrison Guest

    4 cylinder has a chain
    6 cylinder has a belt

    The primary difference to you the owner is that the belt requires a periodic
    change and the chain does not. Other differences are slightly lower engine
    noise with a belt, perhaps better efficiency with a belt.

    Dave
     
    harrison, Sep 13, 2003
    #3
  4. Jim White

    Bill Freeman Guest

    I'd vote for the belt over the chain. Chains, while reliable, can
    stretch over time and chain tensioners can fail. Belts go a reliable
    distance, are quiet and when they need changing . .. you'd probably better
    change your water pump too. This makes for greater reliability at high
    mileages albeit with some greater expense.
     
    Bill Freeman, Sep 14, 2003
    #4
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.