Transmission Activity

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Dano58, Jan 2, 2007.

  1. Dano58

    Dano58 Guest

    We're greatly enjoying our 2007 Odyssey EX. One thing I'm confused
    about, however, is the transmission 'activity'.... By that I mean that
    it seems to downshift when you take your foot off the gas and are
    slowing down. This is confirmed by watching the tachometer tick upwards
    as you feel the transmission downshifting. Since our last van was a '99
    Windstar (I was happy when it would simply UPshift!) and my other car
    is a 6-speed Audi A4, I guess I'm not used to the electronics in the
    latest transmissions. Is this really the case - that the car
    downshifts? Or is my transmission about to fall out!

    Thanks.

    Dan D
    Central NJ USA
    '07 Odyssey EX
     
    Dano58, Jan 2, 2007
    #1
  2. Dano58, wrote the following at or about 1/2/2007 2:29 PM:
    I noticed the same thing with my 2006 Accord EX. Read the owner's
    manual, at least I think that's where I read it, and there was an
    explanation that made sense to me. It DID take some getting used to
    though. No doubt about it.

    IIRC, the computer senses a number of things including braking, incline,
    etc and decides whether to just let you coast or to downshift to provide
    extra braking. Now, with 8,000 miles under my belt on the car, I rarely
    notice it.
     
    Unquestionably Confused, Jan 2, 2007
    #2
  3. Dano58

    Joe LaVigne Guest

    Yep, they downshift.

    It is used to help your brakes last longer, and to help aggressive braking
    stop faster.

    This is a good thing.
     
    Joe LaVigne, Jan 2, 2007
    #3
  4. Dano58

    Andy & Carol Guest

    It called "Logic Grade" , that is why you won't grind
    up your rotors..read up on it.
     
    Andy & Carol, Jan 3, 2007
    #4
  5. I would think that it would hurt your gas mileage though. At least it
    would if you are anticipating a stop and just want to coast until the
    light changes. Is it possible that it waits for you to touch the
    brake pedal before it downshifts? That would make more sense.

    On the upside, completing the downshift earlier makes it ready to
    accelerate on short notice. All-in-all, that is one reason why I
    prefer manual transmissions. The AT will never have enough sensors
    until they put in one that can read my mind.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jan 3, 2007
    #5
  6. Dano58

    jim beam Guest

    which is precisely what it does do - it takes the signal from the brake
    pedal switch.
    you haven't driven an automatic lately.
     
    jim beam, Jan 3, 2007
    #6
  7. Dano58

    Tegger Guest



    Your tranny is fine.

    The extremely sophisticated electronics installed these days have
    considerable control over shift behavior. In addition, the transmission
    will actually "learn" your driving style and adjust its behavior for that.

    Some people find newer transmissions' behavior disconcerting when compared
    to older designs.

    The very best thing you can do for your transmission is to change the fluid
    precisely according to the maintenance schedule, and to ONLY ever use Honda
    genuine ATF-Z1 fluid. If you want to change the fluid MORE often, that's
    even better.
     
    Tegger, Jan 3, 2007
    #7
  8. Dano58

    Dano58 Guest

    Thanls for all of the responses. I figured it was a function of these
    intelligent transmissions. Of course, I could read the manual but every
    time I think about it, the car isn't actually here....!

    Dan D
    '07 Odyssey EX
    Central NJ USA
     
    Dano58, Jan 4, 2007
    #8
  9. Dano58

    Dano58 Guest

    Thanks for all of the responses. I figured it was a function of these
    intelligent transmissions. Of course, I could read the manual but every
    time I think about it, the car isn't actually here....!

    Dan D
    '07 Odyssey EX
    Central NJ USA
     
    Dano58, Jan 4, 2007
    #9
  10. Dano58

    JXStern Guest

    I wish they would supply a flow chart or other documentation.

    J.
     
    JXStern, Jan 5, 2007
    #10
  11. Dano58

    Brian Smith Guest

    Take the Manual in the house, then when you're in the reading room, you
    can find out all about the vehicle.
     
    Brian Smith, Jan 5, 2007
    #11
  12. Dano58

    dgk Guest

    My understanding is that the cars do learn how you drive. Now, I'm not
    really a car guy, but I'm a computer programmer. I can certainly see
    how the computers could learn how you drive and act on it, but it
    would also need to understand that a car can have more than one
    driver. Until you actually have to log-in, it might get confused. Now
    is this the guy with the lead foot or the lady with the sweet
    disposition?

    Perhaps they'll start using retinal scans or fingerprint detectors on
    the steering wheel. It should be a good theft-prevention model, until
    you try letting your designated driver take you home and it won't
    start. And then it won't start for you because you're drunk.

    Maybe we'd best forget the whole idea.
     
    dgk, Jan 5, 2007
    #12
  13. Well, I'm sure they have improved somewhat since they made the one for
    my '98 Ody, but I would be surprised if they now know in which gear I
    want to do compression braking. I'm pretty sure they don't downshift
    in anticipation of me wanting to do hard acceleration two seconds
    before I touch the gas pedal. How does it know that, even though I am
    doing a steady 40 mph, I want to stay in second gear to be ready to
    make a move in traffic? Does it know not to downshift just before we
    crest the hill? For my Ody, I would be happy if it just didn't
    downshift when I hit Resume on the CC 4 mph below the target speed. I
    would hope they have at least fixed that.

    Bottom line is they are OK for average (or worse) drivers in light
    traffic. But I definitely don't like them in heavy city traffic and
    they just don't belong in any sports car IMO.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jan 6, 2007
    #13
  14. Dano58

    jim beam Guest

    no, they provide a handy little lever that allows you to take care of
    that by hand.
    see above.
    press the brake and you'll find out. they have grade control logic.
    increasing speed + zero gas = downshift.
    tell that to porsche - last i heard, their autos were faster than their
    sticks.
     
    jim beam, Jan 6, 2007
    #14
  15. Right, you can force the downshift or hold the gear manually but a.
    then its not automatic and b. it is clumsy to shift especially on the
    steering column.
    My comment is that the transmission downshifts when I dont want it
    too, i.e. just before cresting the hill when I would manually just
    stay in the higher gear for a few more seconds.
    That is because most Porsche buyers are people who want to show off
    how rich/cool they are and don't really care about driving it or even
    know how.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jan 6, 2007
    #15
  16. Dano58

    Joe LaVigne Guest

    I would agree that they do not belong on any sports car, but IMO, the only
    time I really WANT an Auto is for heavy city traffic.
     
    Joe LaVigne, Jan 6, 2007
    #16
  17. Dano58

    jim beam Guest

    but don't say it can't hold a gear because it can! you can leave it in
    full auto or you can manually over-ride - the ultimate in choice. i
    agree with you about column shifts however - i can't stand them.
    dude, you said auto's couldn't hold a gear - they can. and grade logic
    means they select the right gear, certainly a good deal better than some
    of the individuals that pop up here from time to time putting their
    sticks into neutral and coasting down hills. modern autos are not only
    programmed to shift right, they also learn what the driver likes.
    eh? how does criticizing [without basis] driver skill address the
    ability of a computer-controlled transmission to shift faster than a
    stick? makes no sense.

    bottom line, you're welcome to drive whatever you want, but don't
    criticize autos on the basis of fud - it's simply not justified.
     
    jim beam, Jan 6, 2007
    #17
  18. Sorry, I misread the post. I thought you were saying that the ATs
    were *selling* faster than the MTs.

    My preference for MT is not based on how fast it shifts but rather the
    ability to integrate the shifts seamlessly into driving. This
    requires decisions based on information that the computer cannot
    possibly know. May not matter much for a minivan, but it is
    fundamental for a sports car.

    The problem with most (virtually all) ATs is that they are biased
    toward automatic operation and discourage manual operation. Also, I
    don't particularly care for the slippage of the torque converter. I
    understand that VW has a paddle shift AT that is actually built like
    an MT. This has potential if the AT function can be completely
    disabled, i.e. it never makes a shift without a command from the
    driver. (Not that I would buy a VW under any circumstances.)
    fud?
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jan 6, 2007
    #18
  19. It depends on your attitude. For me, the only joy in "stop and go"
    traffic is seeing how far I can go without touching the clutch or the
    brake. When traffic is heavy but moving, I like the control that I
    get from an MT.
     
    Gordon McGrew, Jan 6, 2007
    #19
  20. Dano58

    jim beam Guest

    that's your perception. unless you've driven a modern auto, especially
    a sports auto, you're just making uninformed assumptions and using them
    as your basis for criticism.
    how? my auto has the shift in exactly the same place as where the stick
    would be. i see no difference. the transmission even has a no-lock
    gate between 3rd & 4th [commonest manual override] especially so you
    /can/ flip up and down at will.
    eh? what "slippage" is that? how does its mechanical function differ
    from a clutch [other than it has a much better efficiency range and is
    much smoother of course]?
    as are a lot of the euro "autos".
    dude, have you ever driven an auto? you have pretty much full control
    over everything except clutching action - except for the fact that it
    won't let you select wrong gears of course.
    fear. uncertainty. doubt. if there is no technical argument against
    something, people resort to fud.

    here's another nugget for you - automatics are banned from f1. like
    certain types of ground effects, they gave too much advantage to the
    [better funded] teams that had them. the compromise is paddle shift,
    but even then, interpretation of the ban has been taken to the limit
    since a lot of the control functions are still automatic.
     
    jim beam, Jan 6, 2007
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.