Transmission Lubrication

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by gmctruck68, Jan 8, 2006.

  1. gmctruck68

    gmctruck68 Guest

    How do I lube a 4 speed manual transmission, in the 88-91 Civic Hatch? I
    know I have to use gear lube, but where do I put it?!?
     
    gmctruck68, Jan 8, 2006
    #1
  2. gmctruck68

    ah1244 Guest

    If you look at the right-side face of the transmission housing (where
    the right CV shaft comes out the differential), there is an oil filler
    plug above it (on the side face). The transmission drain plug is at the
    bottom (side) of that side-plate.
    Replacement capacity = 1.8 L (1.9 U.S. quarts)
    Torque settings: Oil filler plug = 45 N.m. (33 lb-ft)
    Oil drain plug = 40 N.m. (29 lb-ft)

    Use Genuine Honda Manual Transmission oil, NOT gear lube. The manual
    will say to use 10W-30 engine oil, but that was 15 years ago. From what
    I have heard, the oil chemistries have changed, so need to put the
    Honda stuff now (dealer service departments stock it....about $3 per
    quart). If you have problems locating the filler and drain plugs please
    drop a line, I will scan the diagram off the service manual and e-mail
    it over.
     
    ah1244, Jan 8, 2006
    #2
  3. gmctruck68

    SoCalMike Guest

    you sure its gear lube? i thought that generation used 10w40.
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 8, 2006
    #3
  4. gmctruck68

    TeGGeR® Guest


    You have to put the car on stands and get underneath. There are two plugs
    in the side of the tranny case pointing at the right front wheel. The upper
    one is a fill, the lower one a drain.
    http://www.tegger.com/hondafaq/misc/92-95_civic_mt_oil_change.pdf

    The above PDF is from the '92-'95 Civic, but the plug locations are the
    same as yours. The drain plug takes the square drive of a ratchet. Scrape
    out the dirt before inserting the ratchet to make sure it goes in far
    enough not to strip as you try to crack the drain loose. If the plugs have
    not been removed in a long time, you may have great difficulty breaking
    them loose.

    To fill, you need to have the car LEVEL, and you'll need a pump to attach
    to your lube bottle (a lot like a hand-soap bottle pump). The pump needs to
    have a clear vinyl hose that goes into the fill hole. Fill until it
    dribbles out.
    The pump is available at any auto supply store. The vinyl hose can come frm
    Home Depot if your pump didn't come with one.


    And use Honda MTL, not "gear lube" or the 10W-30 specifed in the workshop
    manual.
     
    TeGGeR®, Jan 8, 2006
    #4
  5. gmctruck68

    Elle Guest

    A 1.5 foot breaker bar should be sufficient, though as
    always, be careful. Brace yourself so you don't get hurt,
    etc.
    Gravity feed works fine for 88-91 Civics; no pump is
    necessary.

    Buy the clear tubing at Lowe's or Home Depot for a few
    bucks, tops, probably. Three feet should be plenty.
    Elaboration: Reports are that superior shifting occurs with
    the Honda MT fluid. More importantly, there are many claims
    on Usenet that 10W-30 and -40 have changed since about 1991
    such that their chemistry is deleterious to the
    transmission. I don't buy that--yet. I have always used my
    91 Civic's manual-specified 10W-30 or 10W-40. No problems
    after 173k miles. Anyone saying there will be problems down
    the road is speculating based on rumor innuendo. (Unless
    someone finally has coughed up a reputable citation on the
    subject.)

    If Honda thought 10W-30 or -40 today is dangerous to the
    transmission, I think they would have said something.

    www.autozone.com has a free online repair guide /specific/
    to the 88-91 Civic that covers manual transmission fluid
    changes. With drawings and photos.
     
    Elle, Jan 8, 2006
    #5
  6. gmctruck68

    TeGGeR® Guest



    And make certain the ratchet square is well seated. You don't want to round
    off the square in the bolt.



    Gravity works fine for my car too, and I used that method for years. But
    I've since found it's easier using the inexpensive hand-pump.




    The anti-wear additives (ZDDP, for example) that used to be present in
    motor oils have been greatly reduced or eliminated in the interests of
    protecting the catalytic converter. Transmissions have no cat issues, so
    Honda MTF has loads of anti-wear additives (hence its distinctive odor).




    They have.

    An example from the '02 RS-X manual (pg 13-4):
    "Always use Honda Manual Transmission Fluid (MTF). Using motor oil can
    cause stiffer shifting because it does not contain the correct additives."
     
    TeGGeR®, Jan 8, 2006
    #6
  7. gmctruck68

    TeGGeR® Guest



    Just checked the '96-'00 Civic Helm manual. It contains the same warning,
    word for word.
     
    TeGGeR®, Jan 8, 2006
    #7
  8. gmctruck68

    Elle Guest

    Sort of. But I don't discount the substance of what you
    cited.
    correct additives."

    ISTM a manual transmission is pretty much a manual
    transmission, so I agree that what's written in the 2002
    Honda manual you cite above should apply to any year's
    transmission, including my 1991 Civic's. In the future, I
    will take note of it in posts, as it is helpful.

    OTOH, I remain hesitant to translate this to a prediction of
    disaster if one uses 10W-30 or -40. I can see that "stiffer
    shifting" implies more wear, but ISTM it might be
    negligible. Especially since the statement is qualified with
    "can cause" vs. "will cause." To read this like a lawyer
    blah blah...

    So I'm not panicked on this point. My intent, stated in the
    recent past, is to switch my 91 Civic to Honda MTF when the
    next tranny oil change is required, see if the shifting is
    superior, and draw more conclusions then.
     
    Elle, Jan 8, 2006
    #8
  9. gmctruck68

    E Meyer Guest

    Go back another decade to the generation the OP has and check again. We had
    an '81 and an '87 and the recommended manual trans fluid was 10w-30 motor
    oil. There was also a caveat to not use synthetic because the synchros
    wouldn't work correctly with it.
     
    E Meyer, Jan 9, 2006
    #9
  10. gmctruck68

    TeGGeR® Guest


    Yes, and my '91 Integra's shop manual also specifies 10W-30.

    But the point is that the motor oils in use now are not the same as those
    available in 1991. Honda's metallurgy for synchros is unlikely to have
    changed more than motor oil formulation.

    It appears that the changeover to the MTF specification coincides with the
    planning and implementation of much stricter OBD-II emission controls,
    which would have been the primary driver behind zinc and sulfur reductions
    in motor oils.

    Synthetic motor oils have greater film strength than mineral oils and are
    meant to reduce friction as much as possible. Synchros require friction to
    function. If the synchros cannot work correctly with the oil film that lies
    between their surfaces, they cannot correctly apply the friction that makes
    them work. Zinc and sulfur are sort of "sacrificial anodes", taking the
    brunt of the friction before the underlying synchro metal does, should the
    oil film break, which it will under heavy use. This is the reason Honda's
    MTF has the additives it does.

    Honda MTF is the preferable oil for any Honda manual transmission that
    originally specified 10W-30.
     
    TeGGeR®, Jan 9, 2006
    #10
  11. gmctruck68

    Rob B Guest

    I plant o use MTF next as well but....

    my '93 civic honda sevice manual says 10w30 or 10w40 with a service grade
    of SF or SG

    would not the sevice grade SF / SG matching cover the concerns of oil
    formulation.

    robb
     
    Rob B, Jan 11, 2006
    #11
  12. gmctruck68

    E Meyer Guest

    Lubrication wise, yes. But those ratings relate to the oil being used as
    motor oil, not transmission oil. The problem with synthetic (i.e. Mobil 1)
    was that it was (is) too slippery for the synchros to work correctly. They
    depend on a little friction to get them moving.
     
    E Meyer, Jan 11, 2006
    #12
  13. gmctruck68

    TeGGeR® Guest



    Yeah. It was printed before the changes to oil configuration, as I said a
    few messages ago.



    SF & SG are obsolete. Good luck finding that stuff these days. All you'll
    find now is SL and SM.
     
    TeGGeR®, Jan 12, 2006
    #13
  14. gmctruck68

    Rob B Guest

    well that is the issue then, *if* you could find SF/SG then you'd be ok but
    10w30 spec is useless by itself ... where most people seem to be betting on
    10w30 == 10w30 not

    robb
     
    Rob B, Jan 12, 2006
    #14
  15. gmctruck68

    SoCalMike Guest

    if you can find oil that old. the concerns these days are all the
    friction reducers put into current oil grades that MIGHT cause the
    syncros to not work right.

    too much slipperiness can be a bad thing.
     
    SoCalMike, Jan 12, 2006
    #15
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.