UAW inflexible on concessions...

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B, Dec 24, 2008.

  1. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Elle Guest

    I do think doctors are biased and terribly uninformed these
    days. First, more patients = more bucks. Second, the biggest
    problem with health care today is access. Many doctors will
    not see a patient without insurance. Even with insurance,
    finding a doctor who is on the plan is often a nightmarish
    labor. Plus they change all the time. With patients making
    appointments for every little complaint, the more severe
    cases get to wait or are not seen at all.
    The internet and free nurses' hotlines are your friend,
    contrary to some bs the media puts out from time to time
    (brought to you by who else? The medical "profession."). The
    net would have told you how high the risk of infection is
    with such a wound, so tetanus, intense cleansing, etc. are
    needed immediately.

    I am for Universal Health Care but for it to work, a
    cultural shift in attitude in the U.S. will be necessary.
    More is not better in the case of health care and can
    sometimes in fact be worse. Americans are not ready to
    accept this.
     
    Elle, Dec 27, 2008
    #41
  2. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    labatyd Guest

    How so a fraud?

    Give me unregulated capitalism. You can have your socialism. Ask the soviets
    or the Chinese how they liked their systems. But that's OK. The US will make
    their brand of socialism/communism work I'm sure. Most or north America
    hates capitalism so they sure to get something lots worse.
     
    labatyd, Dec 27, 2008
    #42
  3. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    labatyd Guest

    And you're are ?????
     
    labatyd, Dec 27, 2008
    #43
  4. I sure am. When I was a kid, doctors made lots of money, but for the most
    part healthcare was non-profit, esp hospitals.

    Now the money managers have stepped in and are only about profits. Have to
    keep the shareholders happy! (Gee, where did I hear that before). Just
    like GM, but in this case you can't avoid it...unless you want to go to
    Mexico or India...
     
    Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B, Dec 27, 2008
    #44
  5. Unfortunately, the fellow travelers from 68 are now trying to run the
    country and pervert the next generation, too.

    Look at Nobama and his Clintonista cabinet.

    Sir Charles the Curmudgeon
     
    CharlesTheCurmudgeon, Dec 27, 2008
    #45
  6. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    LauraM Guest

    I saw Gettlefinger on CNN last night. He said the unions gave
    concessions in 2005 and in 2007 and basically asked us viewers how we
    could possibly expect them to keep giving concessions. Oh brother!
    Don't we all give more and more toward healthcare and get less and
    less in bonuses, etc., every single year? And he thinks the precious
    union workers can't give every year too? Pahleeze. I cringe when I
    see that guy talk.
     
    LauraM, Dec 27, 2008
    #46
  7. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    in2dadark Guest

     
    in2dadark, Dec 28, 2008
    #47

  8. Nah, let's not give concessions...

    I knew a guy from Pittsfield, MA that had an uncle working at the
    transformers division that was there. Some of the transformers had their
    own special rail cars, they were so huge.

    He said how his uncle would come over to the house and say, "We're going
    to bring this company to it's KNEES!!!"

    They did. Transformers was sold to Westinghouse (pretty interesting, since
    GE was started by Edison and Edison and Westinghouse were rivals...) and
    moved to Ohio. All those IBEW workers found themselves leaning on brooms
    in malls...
     
    Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B, Dec 28, 2008
    #48
  9. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    me Guest

    But they didn't give in - and that's what really counts!
     
    me, Dec 28, 2008
    #49
  10. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    me Guest

    Fascism and Socialism are distant cousins at best. Fascism is the
    merger of government and business "for the benefit of both" according
    to the dictionary definition, but "for the benefit of those in charge
    in the government and the biggest capitalists" on a practical basis.

    Fascism is what we have had under GWB/Cheney, where any government
    spending is good spending, and government regulation is good
    regulation, as long as it benefits them and their neo-con friends. The
    bailouts are just icing on the cake of their long running fascist
    state.

    While their fascist enterprise has lacked the traditional dictatorial
    ruler, the dramatic expansion of the powers of the Executive Branch,
    combined with a penchant for ignoring the Constitution whenever
    convenient, along with the most ineffective Democratic Congress in
    many years has given them the closet thing you will likely ever see to
    dictatorship in this country (I hope).
     
    me, Dec 28, 2008
    #50
  11. Oh, you can use it.

    Just like if you PAID for that screwdriver, you should be able to USE it
    to roof your house.

    And you can. But that doesn't make it a good idea.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Dec 28, 2008
    #51
  12. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    labatyd Guest

    Yes. IOW, the common person doesn't count.

    Socialism, gee the common person doesn't count either. He belongs to the
    state.
    I hope too. Don't count on it. All you need is one more "emergency". After
    all FDR was able to extend the normal two terms. And as you emntion the
    contsitution has largely been ignored or modiifed and will be again.
     
    labatyd, Dec 28, 2008
    #52
  13. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Gosi Guest

    Pure fascism like pure socialism as well as pure capitalism has never
    excisted for very long because the very soon result in dictatorship.
    Kings, presidents, whatever name they use all eventually stop being
    anything good for the general population and the one at top uses all
    and every means of making sure his powers remain absolute.
    In the US the two political parties make sure they divide everything
    between themselfes.
    It does not matter what anyone thinks they are just two sides of the
    same coin.
    They then dress a few monkeys up for the front in two similar colours.
    You do not have any sayings about things as individuals.
     
    Gosi, Dec 28, 2008
    #53
  14. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    labatyd Guest

    While I agree there never has been full blown capitalism I disagree that it
    can not last indefinitely. In fact the only time it has existed in it's
    closest form is in the USA. Actually not quite true. Switzerland has had
    something close for a longer period. Over two centuries now for the USA but
    you can hardly compare today's version with how it began. That's a fairly
    long period considering human history. Today it would probably be better
    described as fascism. Definitely moving in that direction. It could be
    halted should the citizens wake up but it is my current belief that won't
    happen. A hundred years from now, probably less it won't be the best place
    in the world to live. It's rapidly losing it's appeal. Most people living
    there today (and in Canada) don't appreciate what capitalism has done for
    them. They perceive an unwarranted ugly side of capitalism and wish to get
    rid of it. Careful what you wish for. You just might get it.
     
    labatyd, Dec 28, 2008
    #54
  15. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    me Guest

    Well, during the robber baron period it was awfully close. The last 8
    years, with little enforcement of anti-trust laws and the gutting of
    many regulations or the agencies that administer them, is also very
    close.
    Post Bush/Cheney/Neo-cons, you are correct. An ugly direction that
    threatens the very foundations of our country.
    Probably correct. The general populace is not all that sharp and
    easily brainwashed/fooled. They live on sound bites and talk show
    rhetoric. Look at what the neo-cons were able to do over the last 8
    years.
    You may be right. The neo-con conspiracy continues to take them for
    all they are worth while the people smile and nod. A few woke up in
    the last election but only after a catastrophic occurrence. I'm not so
    sure they won't fall asleep again.
     
    me, Dec 29, 2008
    #55
  16. YES! They stuck to their guns! Their jobs at $14 an hour went away, and
    when they were gone there were 2,500 more people in the workforce than the
    area could handle. 30 applicants for every job.

    So, If I need to hire someone, and figure I'll have to pay $12 an hour to
    get who I need, I can now offer $8 an hour because SOMEONE will take it!
     
    Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B, Dec 29, 2008
    #56
  17. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Canuck57 Guest

    Actually, there are strict limits on what the government will
    guarantee for pensions. And I doubt that auto workers will get any
    more unemployment than an office worker or other worker.

    Jeff
     
    Canuck57, Dec 30, 2008
    #57
  18. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Mike Marlow Guest

    You have not watched what has happened to benefit UAW workers in other
    states over the past 10 year have you? Extended unemployment benefts are
    only the beginning of the preferential treatment they've received.
     
    Mike Marlow, Dec 31, 2008
    #58
  19. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Canuck57 Guest

    I know, they are sacred cows that need the slaughterhouse (firings).
     
    Canuck57, Dec 31, 2008
    #59
  20. Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B

    Tony Harding Guest

    Good post, thanks, Elle.
     
    Tony Harding, Jan 1, 2009
    #60
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.