Used Civic or new Fit?

Discussion in 'Civic' started by nblomgren, Apr 12, 2006.

  1. nblomgren

    Kent Finnell Guest

    You're making the assumption that it is weak in that department. If you get
    the Base, it might be a good idea to go for bigger but lighter wheels and
    tires. Maybe more speed and mpg.
     
    Kent Finnell, Apr 22, 2006
    #61
  2. nblomgren

    pars Guest

    My lightweight Koenig Tuner can get me more speed (but not on top end)
    and improved mpg over the steel winter wheels. I wonder if they're
    compatible with new Fit. My Konig wheels have 4x100 bolt pattern.

    Pars
     
    pars, Apr 22, 2006
    #62
  3. nblomgren

    Kent Finnell Guest

    The 15 inch alloys on the Sport are 4 bolt. I would guess that the 14 inch
    steel ones on the Base are also 4 bolt. I wonder if Tire Rack has the Fit
    up yet.

    I'll check. Later ... apparently Tire Rack doesn't have any wheels listed
    at this time for the 2007 Fit.
     
    Kent Finnell, Apr 22, 2006
    #63
  4. nblomgren

    Jason Guest

    Pars,
    You should also consider the various Civic models. The engine in the
    Civics are more powerful than the engine in the Fit. They should have
    brochures at the dealership re: to the Civic and Fit. There are statistics
    (eg horsepower, torque, etc.) in the back section of the brochures. They
    may have their best brochures locked up. They do this at the local
    dealership in my town since people were taking handfuls of them instead of
    just one brochure per customer. The dealerships have to pay for the
    brochures. I had to ask one of the salesman to give me the brochures.
    Jason
     
    Jason, Apr 22, 2006
    #64
  5. nblomgren

    Kent Finnell Guest

    The easy way is to go to www.honda.com and click on either the Civic sedan
    and choose an appropriate model (LX is the closest) and then compare to the
    Fit (either Base or Sport).

    It can be done the opposite way also. Choose the Fit and then the Civic
    model. It is an interesting exercise.
     
    Kent Finnell, Apr 22, 2006
    #65
  6. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    yup. i looked at one today. the price difference between that and the
    scion xA is just too big, IMO. you get a "magic seat" (which is hella
    impressive!) and side curtains for a couple grand more than the xA. for
    a couple grand more that seat better DO magic tricks, amongst other
    things...

    im still mulling it over. finally saw one in person, looked at the
    sticker, sat in it, played with the seats. its a masterwork of design,
    definately.
    i dunno. the regular civics dont seem too practical. i use my hatchback
    on an almost daily basis.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #66
  7. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    have you actually seen one? the fit has more useable space, in several
    different capacities. space-wise, a civic coupe or sedan cant come close.

    MPG? not too impressive. the 1.5 gives 32/38, which is about what my CX
    is rated. that alone wouldnt be a reason to trade.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #67
  8. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    i know the scion xB is rated as a "wagon", with lower premiums.
    hopefully the fit would be as well.

    no one rices out/races 4 door hatchbacks!
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #68
  9. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    USABLE cargo space. and them back seats fold DEAD flat. and they fold
    up, and...
    which is really funny as i laugh at the costco members trying to put a
    32" tv in their civic sedan.
    i took a good look at it, and popped the hood. the small front end and
    area behind the rear wheels are what makes it short. the actual cabin is
    huge. the engine packaging is nice and not that tight. everything seems
    to be stacked, and since its got a timing chain, the engines a bit
    narrower.
    i wonder if the sport would be any different. prolly not.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #69
  10. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    do they even make one? i guess i could check honda.co.uk, or honda.co.jp
    and do some research.
    im not too sure bout that. the 1.5 isnt much smaller than my 1.6 CX and
    has 10 years of R&D behind it. plus all the years it was "beta tested"
    in europe.

    i touched 100+ in my CX on a trip to laughlin, NV. it took 4th gear to
    get that high, and i have no idea what the revs were, but the mileage
    (as expected) was dismal... 24mpg on that leg of the trip.

    i dont doubt a fit could do that as well. especially with the VTEC. i
    seriously doubt it would be "screaming at its limits", more like "held
    back by wind drag" just like my CX.
    well, i still love my $14k (USD) 1998 CX, and im irked it took them so
    long to do another hatch. the Si does NOT count :) i hope it does well,
    but im not seeing the value, completely.

    course, i need to run the numbers on a scion xA and maybe a toyota yaris
    hatch. i think there are a lot of TRD and aftermarket stuff to soup up
    that lil 1.5VVTi
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #70
  11. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    it comes pretty close to what i paid for mine, in 1998 when honda could
    do no wrong. a 2006 scion xA stickers for LESS than my 98 CX did in 1998.

    and it includes A/C, power windows/locks/mirrors, AM/FM/CD/MP3.
    heh. so was the 300Z i was tailing. not tailing as in racing, per se.
    interstate 40 was clear, sunny, and dry and he flew past me so i took it
    as an invitation to open it up a bit, as well as test the GPS vs. the
    stock speedo.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #71
  12. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    and the yaris came in 3rd, but that was a 4dr sedan.

    id LOVE to see em compare the xA and the fit. same configuration, same
    engine size. but the stock xA has a better stereo, standard.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #72
  13. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest


    then you gotta drive a nissan, fer chrissakes. at least its available
    with a sunroof, i think.

    but nissans a distinct 3rd to ME, behind honda and toyota. its maybe a
    little higher in quality than a mitsu/subaru/mazda.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #73
  14. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    i was offered one, but didnt feel like it. just wanted to see the car,
    play with the "magic seat", look at the MSRP and get a brochure
    there wont be any deals on em til maybe this fall when supply meets
    demand. i could care less about being "first on the block" to have one.
    i dont think you will. theyre all economy cars. youd need an S2000 to
    actually be impressed.
    scion. xA. trick it out.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #74
  15. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    i dunno why it didnt come with stock 15" steel wheels. regardless, an
    aftermarket upgrade would probably be cheaper.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #75
  16. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    then go to www.scion.com and check out the xA. compare prices, standard
    features, and specs.
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #76
  17. nblomgren

    Jason Guest

    The regular Fit does NOT have cruise control and no spoiler. The Fit Sport
    does have Cruise Control and a spoiler. Those appear to be the major
    differences. Does anyone no any other major differences?
    I believe the Fit has NO remote entry and no security system--the Fit
    Sport has both.
    Jason
     
    Jason, Apr 23, 2006
    #77
  18. nblomgren

    SoCalMike Guest

    sport adds the 200w mp3 capable stereo, and 15" wheels vs 14"
     
    SoCalMike, Apr 23, 2006
    #78
  19. nblomgren

    pars Guest

    Odds are it's probably 4x100, but I'll have to check into it some more.
    I'll definitly save some $$$ if I can use my old alloys.

    Pars
     
    pars, Apr 23, 2006
    #79
  20. nblomgren

    pars Guest

    The base model in fact, does come with a 14" steel wheels. It's only
    the top of the line Sports model which comes standard with the 15 aloy.
    An intresting observation. The price difference between base US vs
    Canadian Fit is about $1k difference, while there's about $4k
    difference for the top-of-the-line Sport model. Go figure...

    Pars
     
    pars, Apr 23, 2006
    #80
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.