What factors go into the oil life indicator: 2006 Civic

Discussion in 'Civic' started by na, Sep 11, 2006.

  1. na

    Seth Guest

    Yup, no where in there did I sate you said it. Reading comprehension is not
    primary to you I see.
     
    Seth, Sep 18, 2006
    #21
  2. na

    Seth Guest

    I'm gonna give him the beneift of the doubt and say the above was a typo and
    he meant to say 5000 vs. 7500.
    Reading comprehension is not high on his list.
     
    Seth, Sep 18, 2006
    #22
  3. Doubt that it was a typo. That's why he referred to it as an extreme
    example, Seth.

    Arguing between the merits of a 7,500 mi oil change and one at 5,000 is
    not what I'd call extreme.
     
    Unquestionably Confused, Sep 18, 2006
    #23
  4. na

    Seth Guest

    Good point.
     
    Seth, Sep 18, 2006
    #24
  5. I claim bullshit.

    A year is 8,760 hours. A million miles in 8,760 hours calculates
    to....drum roll, please....114+ miles per hour.

    That's straight running, with no stopping for fuel or driver changes.

    Let's say fuel and driver changes are simultaneous, at 5 minutes every,
    oh, 400 miles. That's 2500 stops right there. 2500 times 5 is 12,500
    minutes, or 208 hours. Now instead of 8760 driving hours, you have only
    8552 driving hours.

    Oil changes every 1K miles? Let's say an oil change takes 5 minutes
    (I'm being generous here). Let's further say that it happens, on
    average, during a fuel/driver change. So let's not even calculate the
    extra oil change time; let's leave straight available drive time at 8552
    hours.

    1,000,000 miles over 8552 hours is 117 miles per hour.

    So this Civic drove between 114 and 117 mph for a year straight?


    Well, then, why don't you do that. I'm sure the article would tell us
    how a Civic went 115mph straight for a year, with no hiccups in any of
    the fuel/driver/oil change periods, all of them running at an optimal 5
    minutes.

    Or maybe my quick calculations are all you need to back down on this
    particular fable.


    <snip random stuff about synthetic oils)
    Your calculator has an opinion? Gee, mine just does calculations.
    Maybe my calculator is operating in some number base that yours doesn't?

    Was that 1,000,000 miles in base 2?
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Sep 18, 2006
    #25
  6. na

    Joe LaVigne Guest

    Now THIS I find interesting...

    I, too, have noticed this phenomena in 3rd. It has, on occasion, caused a
    slight grind, as I didn't get the car fully into third before letting out
    the clutch, as the notchiness (good word for it) interrupted my rythem.

    What are the downsides (if any) to changing to a Synthetic Tranny fluid?
    The manual is pretty clear on sticking with Honda's Tranny fluid. Would
    this affect warranty?

    Also, should it be done in a shop, or is it sufficient to just drain the
    fluid and add the Synth? I've never changed Tranny fluid before in any
    car. Always had it done by a shop. But it usually costs $80 or more. If
    it is relatively easy, I'll do it myself...

    Thanks...

    --
    Joseph M. LaVigne

    http://www.thelavignefamily.us/MyPipePages/ - 9/18/2006 1:47:58 AM
    Tobacconist Brick and Mortar Database: http://bam.tobaccocellar.org/

    "If you were waiting for the oppurtune moment ... that was it."
    --Jack Sparrow, "Pirates of the Carribean"
     
    Joe LaVigne, Sep 18, 2006
    #26
  7. na

    highkm Guest

    It's based on nothing useful. I have a 2003 Accord 4-cyl. I switched to
    Amsoil 0w30 at 40,000KM after what I call an initial breakin period. I
    replace the oil filer every 20,000KM. I replace the oil every 40,000Km.
    Amsoil has just recently come up with nano-filter technology that will
    allow me to replace oil filter every 40,000KM. My second break in
    period is just occuring. I have 223,000KM. I am now getting the best
    possible fuel consumption of 5.9l - 6.1l per 100KM while driving 100KM
    per hour. My oil consumption is exactly 0.6l + whatever's in the oil
    filter per 40,000KM. I recently bought a 2006 Pilot. It has a life
    indicator that shows or "reduces" the expected life of the oil the
    higher the sustained engine rev is. I managed to get it to a 5% of life
    left in just over 5500KM. However, I use Amsoil 5W20 (for inital engine
    breakin of 40,000km)which at that mileage is visibly very clean, so all
    I've done is reset the oil life indicator and continued with the same
    oil. The best thing for the society is to inform themselves about
    engine oil and mechanical durability. It will save a ton of money and a
    pile of resources for the whole planet. The rest is scare tactics and
    oil industry capitalizing on everyone's ignorance.

    Hope this helps.
     
    highkm, Sep 18, 2006
    #27
  8. na

    highkm Guest

    Sorry to tell you I used to pay $7.5 CDN for 1l of Honda's 5W20. I now
    pay 6.75 for 1l of Amsoil 5W20. Honda oil is the cheapest
    semi-synthetic blend from Petrocanada on the market. I believe the only
    worse blend is Yamalube, which is $10 per 1l. Although Amsoil 5W20 is
    not a pure synthetic just like Mobil 1 is not (unless it a 15,000
    extended range oil), I would bet my last dollar that Amsoil 5W20 is
    superior to "Honda's" 5W20. I have a 2003 Accord with 223,000KM. I
    drive on Amsoil 0W30 and have been since 40,000KM. I replace the oil
    every 40,000KMs. For me that's every 3 months. If I had to change it
    every 8000KM, that would mean that I'd have to go under the car more
    frequently than every 2 weeks. I guess suckers are born every day, and
    the oil industry loves them, so keep up the busy lifestyle of changing
    oil.

    Cheers.
     
    highkm, Sep 18, 2006
    #28
  9. na

    televascular Guest

    Haha. That's a lot of calculations you went through. I guess I'm wrong
    about the one year time limit; like I said, I don't remember specifics.
    Do the Google search and find the contest website, I'm too lazy.
     
    televascular, Sep 19, 2006
    #29
  10. na

    John Horner Guest


    Blah blah blah. It looks like you have accumulated lots of opinion on
    the topic but little in the way of real data. None of your ramblings
    are backed up with evidence.

    John
     
    John Horner, Sep 19, 2006
    #30
  11. na

    John Horner Guest


    Easily done. Just change your oil at some point early in the countdown.
    Personally I change the oil when the oil life monitor is around 20%
    left to go. Ta da, a safety margin.

    John
     
    John Horner, Sep 19, 2006
    #31
  12. na

    John Horner Guest

    Do you have any factual evidence for this assertion, or is it simply
    your guess? You are saying that Honda's engineering team pushed the oil
    life envelope aggressively in order to reduce perceived cost of
    ownership.

    You should also note that the reason Hondas do well in cost-of-ownership
    calculations is due first and foremost to relatively low depreciation
    costs thanks to high resale values. In fact, it would be counter
    productive for Honda to make recommendations which shorted the useful
    life of it's products and therefore speed up the depreciation curve.

    People readily confuse assertions with fact.


    John
     
    John Horner, Sep 19, 2006
    #32
  13. na

    John Horner Guest


    Actually there has been testing which seems to show that wear metals per
    mile rate decrease as oil continues in service.

    One independent effort:

    http://neptune.spacebears.com/cars/stories/oil-life.html

    There are other industry studies about this, but they cost money to buy.

    John
     
    John Horner, Sep 19, 2006
    #33
  14. na

    Elle Guest

    Actually, the home study you reference appears to have used
    data on a single car and for only a few samples of oil
    total. I wouldn't recommend anyone waste a moment slogging
    through it and figuring out whatever point the authors seem
    to be trying to make. They seem to be amateurs at best.
     
    Elle, Sep 19, 2006
    #34
  15. na

    televascular Guest


    Joe,

    There is no perceived downside to synthetic transmission fluid, besides
    cost. I should warn you, however, that tranny fluid requires a very
    specific viscosity and additive package, and different trannies require
    different fluids. Honda uses the same MTF for nearly every vehicle they
    sell, so just find one that is compatible. I did a lot of research to
    find one that would be appropriate for the '06 Si, and I decided on the
    SF-MTL-P ($30.20 + shipping for one gallon).
    http://theoildrop.server101.com is a great resource.

    Another note: after reading around on the internet, there have been
    some instances where people claimed to switch to Redline MTL in their
    Hondas, and then their synchros failed within 10,000 miles. Who knows
    if the two are related, but it's enough to deter me from buying their
    fluid.

    A transmission fluid change is even easier than an oil change, since
    our Sis have no serviceable tranny oil filter. There are two plugs on
    the side of the transaxle: the top one is for filling, the bottom one
    is for draining. After draining, you fill the case with fluid until it
    starts overflowing through the top fill hole; that's how you know it's
    full. The service manual specs 1.6 quarts. You will need new washers
    for both plugs, and a funnel (preferably with a tube) for adding fluid.
    WARNING: on my old '98 Accord, I had a problem once where I drained the
    tranny fluid via the bottom plug, but the FILLER BOLT HAD SEIZED. I
    couldn't get it off for a while and it caused me a lot of stress. Make
    sure the filler bolt comes off easily BEFORE you begin draining!

    Good luck!
     
    televascular, Sep 20, 2006
    #35
  16. na

    televascular Guest

    Joe,

    I just re-read your post: changing to non-Honda fluid will not affect
    warranty. The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act states that a provider cannot
    void the warranty just because an aftermarket part is installed, unless
    it is proven without doubt that the aftermarket part directly caused
    failure or malfunction due to incompatibility or incorrect
    installation. It is up to the warranty provider to prove the part
    caused failure; you do NOT have to defend yourself.

    But rest assured; pretty much any synthetic tranny fluid is better than
    Honda MTF. Even my dealership's mechanic confirmed that.
     
    televascular, Sep 20, 2006
    #36
  17. Aaaah! I bet that was an unpleasant surprise.

    "Many things may come between the mouth and the morsel." - Cato
     
    Michael Pardee, Sep 21, 2006
    #37
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.