Which one is more snow worthy?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Jill, Aug 12, 2010.

  1. Jill

    Jill Guest

    Hello,

    I have a friend who wants to buy a 4WD or AWD Honda, and they are
    considering the Pilot, CRV and Crosstour. Personally I don't like the
    Crosstour for the way it looks and the Pilot is too big for me. So
    lets say ugliness and being almost as big as a cement mixer weren't
    factors. Can anyone say that there would be a difference between the
    snow worthiness of any of them? I was told that none of them have
    manual 4WD like a jeep has. I guess all of them are AWD?

    Thanks so much!

    Jill
     
    Jill, Aug 12, 2010
    #1
  2. Jill

    jim beam Guest

    attention whore.
     
    jim beam, Aug 12, 2010
    #2
  3. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    As it is your friend who is considering a vehicle, your opinion of the
    Crosstour, nor does the fact that you are not able to handle the size of
    the Pilot has absolutely nothing to do with the purchase.
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 12, 2010
    #3
  4. Jill

    Jill Guest

    Thank you for that very useful feedback.
     
    Jill, Aug 12, 2010
    #4
  5. Jill

    Jill Guest

    Hello,

    I know, but I am just talking about snow worthiness and which one is
    better. She is driving a Subaru Forester, but her lease is almost up
    and thinking of giving Honda a chance.

    Thanks so much,

    Jill
     
    Jill, Aug 12, 2010
    #5
  6. Jill

    Iowna Uass Guest

    Snow worthy is relevant to your geographical location.
    For some, a bombardier snow cat is the only snow worthy vehicle to have.

    For the suburban wife who wants an SUV to drive to the market in, any
    vehicle with decent SNOW tires (or those nokian wr tires for all season)
    should do the trick.

    I would keep the subaru. They have an excellent track record for
    reliability, but not the greatest fuel economy.
    And put some snow tires on it from October to April.
     
    Iowna Uass, Aug 12, 2010
    #6
  7. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    I would place more emphasis on your friend's skill level and experience
    in driving in snow and ice conditions, than snow tires or vehicle.
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 13, 2010
    #7
  8. Jill

    Dave Kelsen Guest

    Jim, I can't recall if I've reminded you of this lately.

    Shut the **** up.


    RFT!!!
    Dave Kelsen
     
    Dave Kelsen, Aug 14, 2010
    #8
  9. Jill

    Jill Guest

    Well thank you all for the information. I heard Honda was the best in
    reliability actually, and even better than Subaru. She's not just
    going to the market and back. She works full time and needs to get
    back home during storms as I do as well. We both live in New England
    in the snow belt area, so we need to be able to handle driving in 6-8
    inches or snow.

    Jill
     
    Jill, Aug 14, 2010
    #9
  10. So had I.

    Go to rec.autos.makers.honda and see my thread over the past couple days
    on the legendary failing Honda transmissions.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 14, 2010
    #10
  11. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    If you and your "friend" can't handle driving in a little bit of snow
    like the amount you mentioned, in any vehicle then you both should have
    your licences suspended thus making the roads in your area safer for
    real drivers. When you feel the need to drive in real snow and ice
    conditions, you're welcome to come to Atlantic Canada during our winter
    months (January and February).
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 14, 2010
    #11
  12. Jill

    Seth Guest

    I'm also in New England and do just fine in 6-8 of snow with my Accord and
    my wife does fine in her Odyssey. You are making WAY more of this then it
    warrants.
     
    Seth, Aug 14, 2010
    #12
  13. agreed.

    Odyssey with decent all season tires goes through the white stuff
    nicely, and over the tall white stuff just fine.

    My 92 Civic Si, though, required that I shovel the driveway at least a
    little bit once the snow got so high that I couldn't plow through it.

    But a CRV? Even in western NY, it works great year round without hassle.

    Some people have to overthink things in order to feel comfortable.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 14, 2010
    #13
  14. Jill

    Jill Guest

    I'm also in New England and do just fine in 6-8 of snow with my Accord and
    Well Seth, I want to know what kind of Accord you have that can do
    that! My friend has a 2008 Accord with an Automatic transmission. He
    has driven it and I have also, and as soon as there was 3+ inches of
    snow on the ground watch out! It was horrible in the snow and ice
    especially if there were small inclines. It would be fine up to 3
    inches and the tires had only 22,000 miles on them at the time we
    tried this.

    One of the reasons I bought the CRV is I feel safe in it, plus it has
    a lot of room for grocery shopping, carrying the kids and carrying
    large items, and its practical and versatile. I also like it because
    it is reported to be very good in deeper snow, up to 12" I heard.

    Jill
     
    Jill, Aug 14, 2010
    #14
  15. Any of them.

    I had zero problems with my 2000 Accord on all season tires. Snow was
    no impediment, even many inches of it.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 15, 2010
    #15
  16. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    Exactly, it all boils down to the skill level of the person behind the
    steering wheel. If he knows his stuff, he can go wherever he wants
    whenever he wants, no matter what Mother Nature throws at him.
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 15, 2010
    #16
  17. Jill

    Jill Guest

    Okay so now my question is: why get 4WD or AWD? What would be the
    point if the Accord is able to drive in 6-8" of snow?

    Thanks,
    Jill
     
    Jill, Aug 15, 2010
    #17
  18. bingo.

    By and large, it's a marketing thing.

    AWD was strictly an Audi thing until a series of events occurred in the
    auto marketing world in the 90s, starting with people buying the
    truck-based SUV that was originally designed for people doing weekend
    rock crawling and going deep into the nasty parts of the woods and
    whatnot for recreation.

    People started buying these SUVs to haul their families around because
    "station wagons and minivans just scream MOM! or FAMILY! way too much, I
    need something DIFFERENT!". The auto mfrs responded by assuming the
    customers wanted 4WD, then the whole thing transmogrified into people
    buying car based tall wagons where all the wheels were driven--but the
    mfrs made them AWD with no complicated buttons or levers or controls,
    replacing the 4WD systems that made the driver think about what he was
    doing and where the levers and gearshift had to be for any given
    situation.

    In essence, you bought a Civic station wagon. But the whole "we must
    drive all wheels" carried over from the original days when the actual
    form that people bought happened to be driving all the wheels in some
    fashion or another.

    You can get through the snow just fine with an Accord, and even better
    if you equip that Accord with snow tires. The snow tire equipped
    Accord, in fact, will do it BETTER than your all-season tire CRV.

    AWD weighs more and causes you to spend more gas to drive it around. It
    also requires more maintenance. Why get AWD? Because you got suckered
    into it. The front wheel drive CRV would get you everywhere you need to
    go in any weather you're going to encounter and choose to drive in,
    regardless.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, Aug 15, 2010
    #18
  19. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    *Why?* is an excellent question. I believe the answer is that people
    who don't know very much listen to the media hype and advertising copy
    and make purchases based on what they are told in commercials, as to
    what *they* need to own and drive. In reality when a person purchases an
    AWD or 4WD vehicle they are making a purchase that is going to cost them
    more money throughout the ownership period of that vehicle. More gas
    needs to be bought (heavier vehicles use more fuel to move them), more
    maintenance expenses (more moving parts require more care).

    I like to think of it akin to the people that make that purchase of a
    travel trailer or RV and use it once or twice a year for a long vacation
    trip. They could have easily saved their money and used their small car
    to travel and stayed in motels or hotels and had money left over every
    year for a long time. Not to mention the fact that they wouldn't have to
    make their meals and do the clean up and make their beds too. It's all
    about being smart and spending you money to get the most bang out of
    your buck.

    Why buy something you don't need, Jill?
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 15, 2010
    #19
  20. Jill

    Brian Smith Guest

    Unless one lives in an area that receives a lot of miserable weather
    conditions pretty much year round, 4WD is an expense that is
    unnecessary. AWD can be fun to drive, if you have places where you can
    unleash the vehicle to run as it is able to do, unfettered by the worry
    of making a purchase of a ticket to the Policeman's Ball. :^)
     
    Brian Smith, Aug 15, 2010
    #20
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.