[QUOTE] Your experience is clearly BS. I'd rather have a 8 year old Accord (well maintained) than a 5 year old GM, Chrysler or Ford product. Any day of the week.[/QUOTE] My experience might be BS but I can assure you that the money flushed the drain on my old Subaru were very real. No old used cars for me jap or otherwise thank you very much. The reliability is way overhyped. [QUOTE] And yet again, you'd be wrong. My Si was assembled in Ontario, using parts from the US, Canada and Japan. The last time there was a common problem with a Honda Auto Tranny it was 02 in the Accords and Odyssey lines using a V6. I know a couple people with 06 Civics with Auto Tranny, and they have had no problems...[/QUOTE] You have a representative sample don't you? And I have k flushed on a 7 y.o. Legacy that I paid k for. Then when I was shopping for a car three years ago I stop by a Honda dealer to see what they had. Well, they had a 3-4 y.o. civic with 50-60k miles on it and the dealer wanted 00 or so for it. k for a stinky piece of "certified" junk with a half the juice taken out of it? It was probably due for a timing belt and gawd knows what else. I went straight to the Mazda dealer and bought a 1 y.o. Protege with 3k on odometer. Very clean and no stench. Granted, Civic has a better shifting tranny and a smooth motor to match but I feel that I got a much better value (and unlike Corolla the car is a hoot to drive) If I were to replace my car and I were in snowbelt I'd get a new Civic Si. A used one? Given the depreciation rates for Hondas: no bloody way! I'm not a complete moron. Used Hondas (Toyolets and Subarus too) are WAY overpriced. So I stand by my recommendation to OP to look elsewhere for a used car. Just my $.02.