Why I'm going to buy an SUV

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Andrew, Aug 6, 2003.

  1. Why do you keep answering then? Makes as much sense as the rest of your
    drivel.

    Rgds, George Macdonald

    "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
     
    George Macdonald, Aug 13, 2003
    #21
  2. What? The NHTSA says the Civic can't get out of its own way? Oh my, what
    next? Does the NHTSA say what the result would be if everybody drove
    Expeditions and kept running into each other? I think you should check out
    the acceleration times *and* if you want to make such claims, they do not
    jibe with SUV fuel economy.

    Rgds, George Macdonald

    "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
     
    George Macdonald, Aug 13, 2003
    #22
  3. Andrew

    DTT Guest

    In AZ Republic front page last week, a report roll over acident on I10
    due to tread seperation on a Ford Expedition. Whole family get killed.
    Witness said the car is driving at speed limit.
     
    DTT, Aug 13, 2003
    #23
  4. Andrew

    Andrew Guest

    http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/local/articles/0808rollover.html

    IMO, those who were killed are fashion victims.

    Andrew
     
    Andrew, Aug 13, 2003
    #24
  5. Andrew

    MikeHunt Guest

    Thanks for your support!!! Apparently you have a LOT more
    free time than I. ;)



    mike hunt
     
    MikeHunt, Aug 13, 2003
    #25

  6. What did I post that would support anything you claim? Obviously you
    cannot respond to the fact that many of the Pickups and SUVs you hawk
    as the pinnacle of safety are more of a threat to their drivers (and
    presumably other passengers) than some subcompacts. You can claim
    they are safer all you want but when they count the bodies, an F-150
    is about twice as likely to kill its driver than is a 4-door Civic.
    Even the most dangerous small four door listed, a Kia Sephia, is no
    more likely to kill its driver than an F-250 Super Cab.
    Not surprised you don't have time to study that web page that refutes
    the BS you spew. What web page is that again, Gordon? Why it's:

    http://www.highwaysafety.org/sr_ddr/sr3507_t2.htm
     
    Gordon McGrew, Aug 14, 2003
    #26
  7. Andrew

    NetSock Guest

    Got shut down huh Mike? Well...it was only a matter of time.

    And stop making excuses for someone knowing more that you. Your ascertain
    that he has "more time", and that's because he knows more, is ludicrous.

    Its obvious you try to show off your knowledge here, when in fact, its
    nothing more than shallow common sense.

    Now shut yer yap and get out.
     
    NetSock, Aug 14, 2003
    #27
  8. Andrew

    BenDover Guest

    I've seen the Insurance company sponsored test reports to which
    you refer. If a manufacture were to use THOSE test to verify
    that their vehicles meet the federal crash standards, that the
    manufactures MUST meet to be able to sell their vehicle in the
    US, the governments NHTSA would NOT accept those test as
    completed, if they were submitted!! That should tell you how
    valid those test are as real science. Those test are simply
    designed to produce a particulr result for the benifit of the
    insurers. As a retired automotive engineer with thirty years
    experience, many of them designing bodies to meet federal
    standards, I will tell you a small car with a five star rating is
    more dangerous to properly belted passengers than a larger car
    with a four star rating and is NEVER as safe as a larger vehicle
    with a five star rating and certainly NEVER safer.. Simply
    because you have a love affair with the Civic, don't like SUV's,
    and choose to believe something different will not change that
    fact. One can not defy the laws a physics. The larger vehicle
    built to the same standards, as are SUV's and cars, will ALWAYS
    do better for the passengers. The fact that the engineers have a
    longer area, within which to build in crumples zones, lengthens
    the time/distance that the forces of the collision must be
    absorbed by the vehicle resulting in fewer force being absorbed
    by ones body, refereed to as the 'third collision' when ones
    organs hits their skeleton. I've seen five properly belted
    passenger in large cars like Town Cars, where the passenger
    compartment had NOT been intruded, killed by the third collision
    because of high speed. That will happen at much slower speed in
    a smaller vehicle, period. I'm merely trying to enlighen some of
    the misconception posted in NG's. Whether one choose to believe
    that or not is up to the individual, I could not care less. I
    don't have any love or need for an SUV or any truck, I drive
    large cars. From my years of experience I know I will never buy a
    subcompact car
    or let my family ride in one. It is your life, your money,
    spend it where you wish.






    mike hunt
     
    BenDover, Aug 14, 2003
    #28
  9. Andrew

    Milleron Guest

    I am 100% in liege with Gordon's opinions on SUVs, but I think that
    this particular comparison might not be entirely fair. The average
    age of Town Car owners and drivers must be about 75, and that alone
    might produce significantly skewed results. Are there any other
    vehicle-to-vehicle comparisons available?
    Ron
     
    Milleron, Aug 15, 2003
    #29
  10. If you mean the same stats on other vehicles, the IIHS website has
    driver fatality stats on a lot of vehicles at:

    http://www.highwaysafety.org/sr_ddr/sr3507_detail.htm

    The point about driver influence (and the difference between Civic and
    Town Car Drivers) is a good one and it is certainly a factor in the
    death rates. In the case of Civic v. Town Car, the Town Car drivers
    tend to be older, frailer, possibly impaired to varying degrees but
    they tend to drive slower and for fewer miles. On the Civic side,
    there would be a fair number of teen drivers.

    There are a lot of obvious driver influences that you would expect,
    but sometimes not. Check out these driver death rates:

    Civic 4-dr 47
    Civic 2-dr 68
    Integra 4-dr 67
    Integra 2-dr 76

    Corolla 86
    Prism 125

    Camry 37
    Accord 2-dr 47
    Accord 4-dr 62

    Kia Sephia 148

    Miata 59
    Mustang 138
    Firebird 267
    Camaro 309 (most dangerous on the list)

    Explorer 2-dr/
    2wd 231
    Explorer 4-dr/
    2wd 103
    Explorer 2-dr/
    4wd 76
    Explorer 4-dr/
    4wd 56

    Blazer 4dr/2wd 195
    Blazer 2dr/4wd 153
    Blazer 4dr/4wd 72

    Cavalier 133
    Sunbird 205
     
    Gordon McGrew, Aug 15, 2003
    #30
  11. Andrew

    TCS Guest

    I'd be interested in seeing the figures for an SUV as SUVs have far worse
    handling than a town car.

    Here in colorado, it's become a cliche how most vehicles that go sailing
    offroad during a snowstorm are 4wd. If its rolled over, it's
    pretty much guaranteed to be an SUV.
     
    TCS, Aug 15, 2003
    #31
  12. Andrew

    dizzy Guest

    Thanks for providing the selfish asshole view, Mike.
     
    dizzy, Aug 17, 2003
    #32
  13. Andrew

    dizzy Guest

    127 lines for that, eh dumbass?
     
    dizzy, Aug 17, 2003
    #33
  14. Andrew

    MikeHunt2 Guest

    Your welcome! Just curious, how come you are such and
    expert on a##holes? ;)




    mike hunt
     
    MikeHunt2, Aug 18, 2003
    #34
  15. Andrew

    Gus Guest

    They're all over Usenet!
     
    Gus, Aug 18, 2003
    #35
  16. Andrew

    NetSock Guest

    [snip]

    Hey Mike...try to change the format and line return when you cut-and-paste
    from the web...it will make you look (less) stupid.

    BWAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA....

    Lets see...17 years old, playing on Mommy's keyboard...
    Too bad...what a great place to start thinning the gene pool.
    Um...thanks again for you "permission".

    Now get a life loser.
     
    NetSock, Aug 18, 2003
    #36
  17. Andrew

    NetSock Guest

    From watching *you* post here.
     
    NetSock, Aug 18, 2003
    #37
  18. Nah. It someone commenting on posts, with adding *anything* to the Honda
    based discussion.
     
    Stephen Bigelow, Aug 19, 2003
    #38
  19. Andrew

    StonyRhoads Guest

    Top posted for easy reading. Apparently the method most readers
    seem to prefer. If not Dizzy, the resident a$$hole expert, has
    enough time on his hands to change it to his liking. ;)




    Pertinent text to follow;





    Apparently you have been leading a sheltered life, if those are
    your core believes. LOL


    mike hunt
     
    StonyRhoads, Aug 19, 2003
    #39
  20. Sorry but you'll have to find another moniker for Dizzy. A$$hole was
    assigned a while ago.... to you!

    See here for your handicap <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/> and if
    finding the right links through all on your own
    <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html> and
    <http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html#refs>

    You know pretending to join a community without looking up their
    established etiquette and practices for efficient use of their
    communication medium is generally considered rude and ignorant. People
    will try to urge you to follow generally acceptable behavior but eventually
    will shun you.

    Rgds, George Macdonald

    "Just because they're paranoid doesn't mean you're not psychotic" - Who, me??
     
    George Macdonald, Aug 20, 2003
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.