you think chery is next honda?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Chinacarforums, May 24, 2006.

  1. IMHO the Avalanche has an excuse; it can tow. It might make an
    excellent "fifth wheeler." But the Ridgeline...yuppie trucklet.
    Gross vehicle weight reveals how poor a design Element is. Probably
    serves well as an urban light delivery vehicle.

    Chasing these "trucklet" niches is exactly the wrong course. All the
    engineering and marketing resources squandered on this stuff detracts
    from Honda cars. Heavy vehicles with indifferent handling that require
    engines with lots of low-end torque is the antithesis of what made
    Honda a great car company.

    I couldn't agree more with the comment re. getting rid of the strut
    suspension. Gotta go back to wishbones, drop the hood and cowl to
    provide the visibility we all loved.
     
    dimndsonmywndshld, May 30, 2006
    #41
  2. That, plus how little capacity it can hold. 800 pounds is the capacity
    limit. That's not even 4 guys. Shoot, after I put myself, my wife, my
    two kids, and our stuff in it, it's at the limit.

    I saw that and begged off.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, May 30, 2006
    #42
  3. Chinacarforums

    SoCalMike Guest

    if all you wanna do is haul a couple dirt bikes to the desert, itll do
    that. not many people tow anything, ever.
    seems to work for scion.
     
    SoCalMike, May 30, 2006
    #43
  4. Well, yeah. You filled it up and it's at the limit. If you think of
    it as a small station wagon or a micro-minivan, its not bad. If you
    need a truck then it isn't going to work for you.

    Jeep Commander weighs over 5200 pounds and only carries 1100 even
    though it carries seven cattle-fed passengers.

    RAV4 capacity is 825 pounds and that has to include the weight of the
    third row seat which allows it to carry seven passengers, although I
    think two of them have to be pretty small to fit.

    Personally I wish that Honda and Toyota would build a large station
    wagon. Not Country Squire big but more like Volvo 240 big. Could be
    built off Accord or Camry platform with performance, luxury and
    economy versions. Must have generous cargo capacity and a much lower
    roof line than all of these stupid trucks.
     
    Gordon McGrew, May 31, 2006
    #44
  5. Well, yeah. You filled it up and it's at the limit. If you think of
    it as a small station wagon or a micro-minivan, its not bad. If you
    need a truck then it isn't going to work for you.[/QUOTE]

    4 guys in a 4 seat vehicle and it's overloaded? And it's something the
    size of the Element?

    That means it's BADLY designed.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, May 31, 2006
    #45
  6. Except for the last part, they think they do: Highlander and Pilot.
     
    Elmo P. Shagnasty, May 31, 2006
    #46
  7. 4 guys in a 4 seat vehicle and it's overloaded? And it's something the
    size of the Element?

    That means it's BADLY designed.[/QUOTE]

    everyone thinks so negatively towards these chinese cars..why?

    china is posed to be the next superpower and is pumping top companies
    in every sector..its natural...
    so its natural to say in the next few years...it is inevitable for
    chinese auto makers like chery to become AT LEAST AS bIG AS KIA and
    other korean manufacturers and in maybe 20 years...overtake US and
    japanese makers.
    http://www.chinacarforums.com
     
    Chinacarforums, Jun 4, 2006
    #47
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.